A 1% fee does not cost you 1% — it costs you a quarter of your money

Fees compound exactly the way returns do. Over thirty years, a one percentage point difference removes a startling share of the final corpus.

By

19 Aug 2026 · 2 min read · investing, costs, funds

An expense ratio is quoted as a small annual number, which is precisely why it gets underestimated. It is not deducted once. It comes off every year, from a balance that would otherwise have kept compounding.

What one percentage point does

₹10,000 a month for 30 years, gross return 12%:

Expense ratioNet returnFinal corpus
0.2%11.8%₹3.32 crore
1.0%11.0%₹2.83 crore
1.8%10.2%₹2.41 crore
Final corpus after fees, from identical gross performance
Final corpus after fees, from identical gross performance0.2% ratio₹3.32 crore1.0% ratio₹2.83 crore1.8% ratio₹2.41 crore
Same contributions, same gross return. The only difference between the bars is the fee.

The gap between the cheapest and the dearest is roughly ₹91 lakh — on identical contributions, from identical gross performance. That is about 27% of the final corpus, paid out in fees you never saw as a transaction.

Where else the drag hides

The one place a higher fee can be worth it

If a fund genuinely delivers more than its extra cost, net of that cost, it wins. The difficulty is that you can only identify this in hindsight, and the persistence of outperformance is weak. The cost, by contrast, is known in advance and certain.

Certain cost against uncertain benefit is the whole argument, and it is why low-cost options have won so much of the flow over the last decade.

See the drag yourself

Open the sip calculator

Where these figures come from

Rates and limits change. Where a figure here differs from the authority, the authority is right — tell us and the page gets fixed the same day.

Published by FinClamp. This guide is information, not financial advice — see the disclaimer.